Comment

Published: December 17, 2024
Abstract Views: 26
PDF (Italiano): 16
PDF: 10
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

In my commentary I express full agreement with the authors with regard to all the issues they address. In particular, I emphasize the centrality of the first interview and reception to those who seek treatment, in order to build a “space of psychological agency.” My view is that the work we do with our patients from the first meeting and within the analytic process is not a work of revelation but of meaning-making. Dwelling on developmental consultation, I emphasize the importance of fostering parental readiness. Finally, placing the demand for care in a network context, which opens up the possibility of confrontation among clinicians, also assumes great importance in my opinion.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite

Viarengo, A. R. (2024). Comment. Ricerca Psicoanalitica, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.4081/rp.2024.949

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.