They killed Spider-Man. Birth, splendour and decline of a mythical phase of clinical psychopathology and psychotherapy. Is there still room for their scientific dignity? A complex connexionist proposal
Accepted: February 7, 2022
PDF (Italiano): 205
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
The landscape of technical interventions in the field of psychotherapy offers a wide range of different treatments. Even Psychiatry (especially the non-academic kind) is producing a huge quantity of research data dealing with two important issues: the widespread surge in prescribing psychotropic drugs and the severe underestimation of side effects and of withdrawal syndromes due to these medications. On the other hand, we cannot find the same research effort being put into conceptualizing, discussing, and providing viable theories questioning the true nature of behaviour defined as relevant from a psychopathologic perspective. Enhancing the understanding of these behaviours could allow for better management of psychotherapeutic processes and not just a mere attempt to control symptomatic aspects. The term ‘outburst’ (or fit) has come back into vogue as an explanation of a supposedly pathological sensation/trauma, even though it is devoid of real semantic meaning. Thanks to the concept of ‘epigenetics’, the evolutionary perspective reintroduces a linear and deterministic description of how residual genes work in causing behaviour. Neuropsychologists and neurobiologists have no doubt about the existence of structures and faulty basic biological mechanisms that allow for the conceptualization of a precise demarcation dividing normality from psychopathology. Firstly, the author gives an in-depth analysis of the many disciplines dealing with human behaviour and then proposes a rigorous and coherent pathway (via a systemic-connexionist approach) towards a modification of the current concepts of mind, psychopathology, and psychotherapeutic change. Furthermore, the author underlines the risk of replacing theoretical concepts with tempting yet misleading descriptive definitions. This article also provides an introduction describing the author’s epistemological framework, the reasons for her choice and she proposes her work method - through a clinical case study - in which transmissibility and verifiability must be the mainstay of its scientific criteria.
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.