The dynamic recursive hologram for a topos of the relational in psychoanalysis

Submitted: February 23, 2021
Accepted: January 1, 2022
Published: December 30, 2022
Abstract Views: 644
PDF: 74
PDF (Italiano): 111
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

This paper puts forward the idea of an extraterritoriality of the Unconscious, or ectopia, meaning that the Unconscious is not entirely contained within the boundaries of individual space. Moreover, the interactive dynamic between the Unconscious of the analytic field and that of the individual field is described providing a framework related to interpsychic and transpsychic space-time. This space-time identifies both the synchronic and diachronic dimension of the contents and defences (qualities) present in the field. The subject’s ectopic space-time thus extends to form a common space-time shared with other subjects. This is the co-constructed aspect invoked by relational theories in psychoanalysis, in fact, as Webster states, integrated unity is the result of different units relating to each other in a new way. This shows in complex systems that do not present a simple, indivisible, elementary original unity, but a homogeneous nature when viewed from the perspective of the whole and a paradoxical, multiple and diversified unit when viewed from its parts. It is the necessary mind-body unity of relational systemics invoked by Gregory Bateson on which the new epistemology is based. The ‘Freudian topos’ of each subject is not only projected onto the group, but also assimilated into the topos of other subjects and contributes to building a shared/common space-time. The character of the Unconscious is thus ectopic, heterotopic, heterogeneous and polytopic; it shows not only in the intrapsychic but also in the other psychic space-times of the field. In this way the classical metapsychology of the individual apparatus is superseded as insufficient either to define the display of the qualities of the Unconscious or to identify its interactive nature.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Albasi C., (2009), Psicopatologia e ragionamento clinico, Cortina, Milano, 2009.
Benjamin J., (2019), Il riconoscimento reciproco, Milano, Raffaello Cortina, 2019.
Boncinelli E., (2010), Mi ritorno in mente. Il corpo, le emozioni, la coscienza, Longanesi, Milano, 2010, pag. 22.
Chantraine P. (1999), Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue grecque, Klincksieck, Paris, 1999.
Civitarese G., (2011), La violenza delle emozioni. Bion e la psicoanalisi post-bioniana, Raffaello Cortina, Milano, 2011.
Conrotto F., (2009), Après-coup: una diversa prospettiva, in Forme dell’après-coup, Le vie della psicoanalisi, a cura di Maurizio Balsamo, Franco Angeli, Milano, 2009.
De Robertis D., (2005), Le logiche dei sistemi complessi: un potenziale per la teoria e la clinica psicoanalitica, in Ricerca Psicoanalitica, XVI,3,2005.
Edelman G.M. (1992), Bright air, brilliant fire:On the matter of the mind, Basic-Books, New York, N.Y.1992, Trad.it. Sulla materia della mente, Adelphi, Milano, 1993.
Florita M., (2011), L’intreccio, Neuroscienze, clinica e teoria dei sistemi dinamici complessi, Franco Angeli, Milano, 2011.
Fogel A., Lyra M.C.D.P, Valsiner J. (1997), Dynamics and indeterminism in developmental and social processes, Erlbaum, Mahwah, 1997.
Freud S., (1899a), Ricordi di copertura, in OSF, vol.2, Borla, Roma.
Kauffman S.A., (1993), The origins of order: Self-organisations and selection in evolution, Oxford University Press, New York, 1993.
Kubie L. (1975), Distorsion of the Creative Process, Noonday Press, New York, pag. 21.
Laplanche J., Pontalis J.B. (1967), Vocabuilaire de la psychoanalyse, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, Tr.It. Enciclopedia della psicoanalisi, Economica, Laterza, Bari, 1993.
Mitchell S., (2002), Il modello relazionale, Milano, Raffaello Cortina, 2006.
Morin E., (2011a), La sfida della complessità, pubblicazione del Centro Studi di Filosofia della Complessità, Edgar Morin, Messina, Casa Editrice Le lettere, Firenze, 2011, pag.59.
Morin E., (2011b), op.cit. pag.71.
Morin E., (2011c), op.cit. pag.71.
Ogden T.H., (2005), This Art of Psychoanalysis. Dreaming Undreamt Dreams and Interrupted Cries, Tr.It. L’arte della psicoanalisi. Sognare sogni non sognati, Raffaello Cortina,Milano, 2008.
Pribram K.H., (1983), The brain, cognitive commodities and the enfolded order, in Bouldin K.E e. Siegel D.J. (2001), La mente relazionale, Cortina, Milano, 2001.
Trevarthen C. (1993), The self born intersubjectivity: The psychology of an infant communicating, in U. Nesser (a cura di) The perceived self: Ecological and interpersonal sources of self-knowledge, New York, Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511664007.009

How to Cite

Lenti, G. (2022). The dynamic recursive hologram for a topos of the relational in psychoanalysis. Ricerca Psicoanalitica, 33(3). https://doi.org/10.4081/rp.2022.531

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.