The subject as a "system": perspectives of the contemporary philosophical debate


Published: December 31, 2010
Abstract views:
150


View on FrancoAngeli (Italiano):
0
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

The researches of Louis Sander and Ed Tronick have re-proposed, in the psychoanalytical field, the topicality of systems theory, based on topics such as procedural behaviour, SOC (States of consciousness), DSC (Dual states of consciousness) and DEC (Diadic expansion of consciousness). Isn't this perhaps a new guise of the old positivism, which reduces man to a machine and the subject to something determined? In order to answer this objection, the thoughts of Edgar Morin, Kurt Goldstein, Alois Riegl and Maurice Merleau-Ponty are examined, highlighting their convergence towards an anti-mechanistic idea of life and nature: to put a continuity between man and nature does not mean to absorb the first term in the second. To consolidate this assert, the sense of freedom is then deepened: a concept of freedom not absolute, but conditional, a freedom not as a decision, but as "letting be" is the other side of a concept that does not put jumps between life, animal and man and can serve as the basis of a new concept of subject, very different from the metaphysical one of modern philosophy.


Iofrida, M. (2010). The subject as a "system": perspectives of the contemporary philosophical debate. Ricerca Psicoanalitica, 21(3), 9–33. https://doi.org/10.4081/rp.2010.468

Downloads

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations