https://doi.org/10.4081/rp.2012.413
The answers
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
The author responds in summary to the criticisms of the various contributors, identifying the three central points which, in her opinion, have emerged overall: the importance of the context, the development of the subject and the clinical implications of her therapeutic model. Having acknowledged the validity of the criticisms and valued the arguments of his colleagues, she reiterates her positions and remains firm in them. The most articulated answer is to Roggero's objection, which concerned the birth of the subject as an expression of self-determination not borrowed from the outside. Harrison argues that such self-determination comes at the moment when the patient goes beyond the relationship with the analyst and changes something in his or her relationship with his or her original context in the broadest sense.
How to Cite
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.