Comment to Stephen Seligman
https://doi.org/10.4081/rp.2020.275
Published: June 16, 2020
Abstract views:
501
PDF:
146
PDF (Italiano):
166
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Re-reading and re-thinking Seligman"s work is like exposing my own point of view rooted in relationship psychoanalysis to a different epistemic, methodological and theoretical approach, in order to gain new and deeper understanding. I am grateful to the author for numerous impressions, some of which I will treat in this work keeping at the forefront the concepts of subjectivity and intersubjectivity in clinical practice with children and their possible applications in adult psychology. (...)
Mazzoleni, A. L. (2020). Comment to Stephen Seligman. Ricerca Psicoanalitica, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/rp.2020.275
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Downloads
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Citations
