The psychology of art according to W.R.D. Fairbairn.

A possible relational reading

Published: January 17, 2020
Abstract Views: 237
View on FrancoAngeli (Italiano): 0
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

In his two papers Prolegomena to a Psychology of Art and The Ultimate basis of Aesthetic Experience, both published in 1938, the Scottish psychoanalyst W.R.D. Fairbairn exposes what, in our opinion, can be chronologically considered as the first psychoanalytic theory of orientated art, unlike what happened until then in the writings on the same subject by Sigmund Freud or other Authors of those times, no longer from a "drive" vision of Psychoanalysis, but according to what is now, and at least for some decades now, defined as "Psychoanalysis of Relationship". This article therefore seeks to highlight both the fundamental elements of this innovative vision and, in particular, some of the aspects of it that could, today, be further analyzed for a real Psychology of Art based on the perspective of "Psychoanalysis of Relationship", with some final considerations on the relevance of this approach in contemporary clinical practice.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Supporting Agencies

W.R.D. Fairbairn, Art work, artist, principle of restitution, relationship, object found

How to Cite

Frati, F., & Gamberini, C. (2020). The psychology of art according to W.R.D. Fairbairn.: A possible relational reading. Ricerca Psicoanalitica, 28(1), 87–110. https://doi.org/10.4081/rp.2017.189