https://doi.org/10.4081/rp.2023.797

Commento al documento finale della Consensus Conference sulle terapie psicologiche per ansia e depressione. Quali evidenze scientifiche?

V. 34 N. 2 (2023)
Pubblicato: 6 settembre 2023
Psicoterapia, consensus conference, ansia, depressione, RCT
Abstract Views: 405
PDF: 144
PDF (English): 40
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Autori

Gianluca Lo Coco
gianluca.lococo@unipa.it
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9027-1899
University of Palermo, Italy.

Il presente commento ha l’obiettivo di evidenziare vantaggi e limiti dell’approccio scientifico basato sulle evidenze nel campo del trattamento psicoterapeutico. Pur riconoscendo l’importanza che le linee-guida ai trattamenti psicologici siano basate su solide evidenze scientifiche, permane la difficoltà relativa alla loro applicazione nei contesti di cura. Tali limiti sono ascrivibili soprattutto all’utilizzo dei disegni di ricerca sperimentali controllati (Randomized Controlled Trials, RCT), che si adattano parzialmente a trattamenti terapeutici non manualizzati rivolti a pazienti con condizioni psicopatologiche complesse. Gli studi metanalitici sul trattamento dell’ansia e della depressione inoltre sottolineano come la qualità metodologica degli studi di efficacia con RCT abbiano un livello di evidenza limitato. La ricerca in psicoterapia e le linee-guida ai trattamenti per ansia e depressione deve muoversi maggiormente verso la prospettiva della personalizzazione dell’intervento clinico.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC
Abbass, A.A., Kisely, S.R., Town, J.M., Leichsenring, F., Driessen, E., De Maat, S., Gerber, A., Dekker, J., Rabung, S., Rusalovska, S., Crowe, E. (2014). Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapies for common mental disorders. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 7:CD004687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004687.pub4
Cuijpers, P., Cristea, I.A., Karyotaki, E., Reijnders, M., Huibers, M.J. (2016). How effective are cognitive behavior therapies for major depression and anxiety disorders? A meta-analytic update of the evidence. World Psychiatry, 15:245-258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20346
Cuijpers, P., Karyotaki, E., de Wit, L., Ebert, D.D. (2020). The effects of fifteen evidence-supported therapies for adult depression: A meta-analytic review. Psychotherapy Research, 30:279-293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2019.1649732
Dazzi, N. (2017). Some critical considerations about the document Psychotherapies for Anxiety and Depression: benefits and costs. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 20:156-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2017.281
Driessen, E., Van, H.L., Don, F.J., Peen, J., Kool, S., Westra, D., Hendriksen, M., Schoevers, R.A., Cuijpers, P., Twisk, J.W.R., Dekker, J.J.M. (2013). The efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy and psychodynamic therapy in the outpatient treatment of major depression: A randomized clinical trial. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 170:1041-1050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2013.12070899
Lo Coco G. (2021). Efficacy of Psychotherapeutic Treatments: Research Based on Clinical Practice. Ricerca Psicoanalitica, XXXII, n. 2.
Research Group for Treatment for Anxiety and Depression (2017). Psychotherapies for Anxiety and Depression: benefits and costs. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 20:131-135. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2017.284
Wampold, B.E., Imel, Z.E. (2015). The Great Psychotherapy Debate: The Evidence for What Makes Psychotherapy Work. New York: Taylor & Francis. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203582015
Westen, D., Novotny, C.M., Thompson-Brenner, H. (2004). The empirical status of empirically supported psychotherapies: assumptions, findings, and reporting in controlled clinical trials. Psychological Bullettin, 130:631-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.631

Come citare

Lo Coco, G. (2023). Commento al documento finale della Consensus Conference sulle terapie psicologiche per ansia e depressione. Quali evidenze scientifiche?. Ricerca Psicoanalitica, 34(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/rp.2023.797
Copyright (c) 2023 the Author(s) Creative Commons License

Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale 4.0 Internazionale.

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.