Lack of communication between dermatologists and histopathologists in real-life settings: a survey of the Italian Association of Hospital Dermatologists (ADOI)
Dermatologist-to-histopathologist communication
https://doi.org/10.4081/dr.2024.10084
Accepted: 26 November 2024
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Skin cancer incidence is increasing worldwide. Clear communication between dermatologists and histopathologists, along with the possibility of sharing clinical images, is critically important. This survey aims to depict the level of communication between dermatologists and histopathologists in clinical practice in Italy. A group of histopathologists participating in monthly online meetings were recruited to participate in our survey. We collected information regarding dermatologists’ habits in providing or not providing clinical and dermatoscopic images of melanocytic/keratinocytic lesions. A total of 63 histopathologists agreed to participate. Fewer than 15% of histopathologists receive routine clinical or dermatoscopic images from dermatologists after the surgical excision of a melanocytic lesion, while clinical and dermoscopic images of non-melanoma skin cancers are sent in fewer than 10% of cases. Our survey revealed that, in Italy, the communication between dermatologists and pathologists is far from being optimal.
Saginala K, Barsouk A, Aluru JS, et al. Epidemiology of Melanoma. Med Sci (Basel) 2021;9:63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci9040063
National Cancer Institute Melanoma of the Skin-Cancer Stat Facts. [accessed on 10 May 2021]. Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/melan.html
Samela T, Fania L, Sampogna F, et al. Incidence of keratinocyte carcinomas in Italy: an exercise in indirect estimation based on melanoma data. Eur J Dermatol 2023;33:230-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1684/ejd.2023.4476
Que SKT, Zwald FO, Schmults CD. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: incidence, risk factors, diagnosis, and staging. J Am Acad Dermatol 2018;78:237–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2017.08.059
Soyer HP, Massone C, Ferrara G, Argenziano G. Limitations of histopathologic analysis in the recognition of melanoma: a plea for a combined diagnostic approach of histopathologic and dermoscopic evaluation. Arch Dermatol 2005;141:209-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.141.2.209
Piccolo V, Moscarella E, Lallas A, et al. MELTUMP: how to manage these lesions in the clinical routine. G Ital Dermatol Venereol 2017;152:266-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S0392-0488.17.05569-9
Ferrara G, Argenziano G, Soyer HP, et al. Dermoscopic and histopathologic diagnosis of equivocal melanocytic skin lesions: an interdisciplinary study on 107 cases. Cancer 2002;95:1094-100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.10768
Ferrara G, Argenyi Z, Argenziano G, et al. The influence of clinical information in the histopathologic diagnosis of melanocytic skin neoplasms. PLoS One 2009;4:e5375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005375
Perasole A, Massone C. Fifteen years of melanomatous meetings. Dermatol Reports 2022;14:9502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/dr.2022.9502
Massone C, Perasole A, Naldi L. Teledermatopathology on the ADOI platform and beyond. Dermatol Reports 2023;15:9670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4081/dr.2022.9670
Fania L, Samela T, Moretta G, et al. Attitudes among dermatologists regarding non-melanoma skin cancer treatment options. Discov Oncol 2021;12:31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-021-00421-w
Massone C, Brunasso AM, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, et al. Teledermoscopy: education, discussion forums, teleconsulting and mobile teledermoscopy. G Ital Dermatol Venereol 2010;145:127-32.
Nami N, Massone C, Rubegni P, et al. Concordance and time estimation of store-and-forward mobile teledermatology compared to classical face-to-face consultation. Acta Derm Venereol 2015;95:35-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-1876
Bauer J, Leinweber B, Metzler G et al. Correlation with digital dermoscopic images can help dermatopathologists to diagnose equivocal skin tumours. Br J Dermatol 2006;155:546-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07342.x
Cerroni L, Argenyi Z, Cerio R, et al. Influence of evaluation of clinical pictures on the histopathologic diagnosis of inflammatory skin disorders. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010;63:647-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2009.09.009
Massone C, Soyer HP, Lozzi GP, et al. Feasibility and diagnostic agreement in teledermatopathology using a virtual slide system. Hum Pathol 2007;38:546-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2006.10.006
Waller JM, Zedek DC. How informative are dermatopathology requisition forms completed by dermatologists? A review of the clinical information provided for 100 consecutive melanocytic lesions. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010;62:257-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2009.06.049
Comfere NI, Peters MS, Jenkins S, et al. Dermatopathologists' concerns and challenges with clinical information in the skin biopsy requisition form: a mixed-methods study. J Cutan Pathol 2015;42:333-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cup.12485
Copyright (c) 2024 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Downloads
Citations
