https://doi.org/10.4081/bse.86
Biomechanical simulations and 3D printing for endovascular device testing
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Endovascular aortic repair is a minimally invasive procedure to treat aortic diseases such as aneurysms and dissections. Thanks to technological advancements, such procedure has steadily shifted from the abdominal aorta towards the ascending part, i.e., near the heart, calling for an extensive and comprehensive benchmarking of (novel) endografts. Given such considerations, we have exploited porcine aorta with a pulse duplicator to analyse the mechanical interaction between the endovascular device and the native tissue. Our results have implications for using the porcine aorta as a model for human aorta in research. Particularly, the combination of in vitro tests performed using ex-vivo tissue, integrated validated patient-specific numerical simulations, mock arteries manufactured by 3D printing, can offer important insight on biomechanical impact of endograft design on post-operative aortic mechanical response.
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Flaminia Aliberti, Lorenza Rinvenuto, Giada Loi, Laura Benedetti, Franca Scocozza, Flavio Lorenzo Ronzoni, Maurilio Sampaolesi, Gabriella Cusella, Michele Conti, Gabriele Ceccarelli, Comparative analysis of different hydrogels for the bioprinting of 3D in vitro skeletal muscle models , Biomedical Science and Engineering: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021)
- Elena Delgrosso, Gaia Martina Sarcinelli, Federica Riva, Federica Riva, Franca Scocozza, Michele Conti, Ian Postuma, Silva Bortolussi, Cinzia Ferrari, Bioprinting for osteosarcoma model: Methodological aspects and experimental applications , Biomedical Science and Engineering: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021)
- Daniele Bianchi, Daniele Bissacco, Maurizio Domanin, Santi Trimarchi, Rodrigo Romarowski, Stefania Marconi, Ferdinando Auricchio, Michele Conti, Coupling in silico and ex vivo porcine model for the evaluation of biomechanical impact of TEVAR , Biomedical Science and Engineering: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021)
Similar Articles
- Marta Canta, Désirée Baruffaldi, Ignazio Roppolo, Annalisa Chiappone, Candido F. Pirri, Francesca Frascella, 3D printed microfluidic devices for cell culture , Biomedical Science and Engineering: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021)
- Anna M. Bassi, Sara Tirendi, Sonia Scarfì, Mario Passalacqua, Vanessa Almonti, Stefania Vernazza, A millifluidic-based 3D-platform as a useful tool for the efficacy of glaucoma therapeutic strategies , Biomedical Science and Engineering: Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022)
- Silvia Bolognin, Lisa M. Smits, Sarah L. Nickels, Stefano Magni, Paul Antony, Kamil Grzyb, Rejko Krüger, Alexander Skupin, Jens C. Schwamborn, A new brain organoid model to study Parkinson's disease , Biomedical Science and Engineering: Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022)
- Tommaso Sbrana, IVTech: The next generation of in vitro models , Biomedical Science and Engineering: Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022)
- Adrian J. Smith, Norecopa: A database of global 3R resources for better Science , Biomedical Science and Engineering: Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022)
- Clarissa Berardo, Andrea Ferrigno, Veronica Siciliano, Marta Cagna, Plinio Richelmi, Mariapia Vairetti, Laura G. Di Pasqua, Optimization of primary hepatocyte isolation for the pharmacological characterization of metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) subtype 5: a study on Reduction , Biomedical Science and Engineering: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021)
- Stefania Blasa, Valentina Pastori, Alessia D'Aloia, Marzia M. Lecchi, Differentiated neuroblastoma F-11 cells as an alternative in vitro model to dorsal root ganglion neurons , Biomedical Science and Engineering: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021)
- Donatella Di Lisa, Mariateresa Tedesco, Elena Dellacasa, Mattia Pesce, Tiziano Catelani, Paolo Massobrio, Roberto Raiteri, Sergio Martinoia, Laura Pastorino, Chitosan biopolymer: Alternative adhesion factor and scaffold matrix for 2D and 3D neuronal cultures , Biomedical Science and Engineering: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020)
- Ermes Botte, Pietro Vagaggini, Joana Costa, Lara Faccani, Ilaria Zanoni, Anna Costa, Arti Ahluwalia, A novel in silico tool for dose assessment in cell culture nanotoxicology , Biomedical Science and Engineering: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021)
- Alice Zoso, Irene Carmagnola, Gerardina Ruocco, Mattia Spedicati, Valeria Chiono, In vitro models of human cardiac fibrotic tissue on bioartificial scaffolds , Biomedical Science and Engineering: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
