https://doi.org/10.4081/bse.82
Reconstituted epithelial corneal tissues for evaluation of drug delivery
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
One possible approach to reduce the use of animals in the evaluation of the ocular drug delivery is that to use cell cultures as model of tissues. In this study are compared two different reconstituted epithelial corneal tissues, a homemade artificial corneal epithelium (Reconstituted Rabbit Corneal Epithelium) and a commercial human corneal epithelial model (COR-100 EpiCornealTM, MatTek), for permeation experiments of three drugs with different physical chemical properties: timolol maleate, cyclosporin A, and a newly synthesized compound, MAGL 17.b. The collected data show that corneal epithelial models are not sufficient to simulate the complexity of the corneal barrier and the presence of a layer simulating the stroma may be necessary to approach the structure of native cornea.
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Most read articles by the same author(s)
- Erica Zucchetti, Daniela Monti, Patrizia Chetoni, Silvia Tampucci, Susi Burgalassi, Reconstituted epithelial tissues and native cornea: A comparison of the influence of surfactants on ocular permeability , Biomedical Science and Engineering: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020)
- Erica Zucchetti, Leonardo Ling, Daniela Monti, Patrizia Chetoni, Silvia Tampucci, Susi Burgalassi, Polyvinyl alcohol/cellulose hydrogel as possible corneal stroma substitute in drug permeation tests , Biomedical Science and Engineering: Vol. 2 No. 1 (2021)
Similar Articles
- Ryan Conder, Leon H. Chew, Fisal Elstone, Marianne Lankhorst, Adam Añonuevo, Salvatore Simmini, Wing Chang, Allen C. Eaves, Terry E. Thomas, Sharon A. Louis, Organoid culture systems: Products supporting one of the biggest revolutions in biological research , Biomedical Science and Engineering: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020)
- Ludovica Cacopardo, Joana Costa, Nicole Guazzelli, Serena Giusti, Sandro Meucci, Alessandro Corti, Giorgio Mattei, Arti Ahluwalia, Real-time cellular impedance monitoring and imaging in a dual-flow bioreactor , Biomedical Science and Engineering: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020)
- Marco Campisi, Sharon W. L. Lee, Tatsuya Osaki, Luca Possenti, Clara Mattu, Giulia Adriani, Valeria Chiono, Roger D. Kamm, In vitro microfluidic modelling of the human blood-brain-barrier microvasculature and testing of nanocarrier transport , Biomedical Science and Engineering: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020)
- Licia Di Pietro, Alice Ravizza, Giovanni Vozzi, Andrés Diaz Lantada, Arti Ahluwalia, Carmelo De Maria, European regulatory framework for the clinical translation of bioprinted scaffolds and tissues , Biomedical Science and Engineering: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020)
- Roberta Nossa, Joana Costa, Ludovica Cacopardo, Arti Ahluwalia, Engineering a dynamic model of the alveolar interface for the study of aerosol deposition , Biomedical Science and Engineering: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020)
- Sara Tirendi, Stefania Vernazza, Sergio Saccà, Anna Maria Bassi, Assessment of an in vitro physiological relevant model to check therapeutic strategies for glaucoma , Biomedical Science and Engineering: Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020)
- S. Motta, L. Callea, L. Bonati, Insights from computational studies in drug design and toxicity assessment , Biomedical Science and Engineering: Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.
