Comparative analysis of different hydrogels for the bioprinting of 3D in vitro skeletal muscle models
Published: 29 September 2021
Abstract views:
1650
PDF:
345
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
In this study we demonstrated an application of 3D Bioprinting using different commercially available hydrogels (CELLINK AB, Sweden) with the aim to identify the most suitable biomaterial for the proliferation and differentiation of murine muscle cells (C2C12).
Aliberti, F., Rinvenuto, L., Loi, G., Benedetti, L., Scocozza, F., Ronzoni, F. L., Sampaolesi, M., Cusella, G., Conti, M., & Ceccarelli, G. (2021). Comparative analysis of different hydrogels for the bioprinting of 3D <em>in vitro</em> skeletal muscle models. Biomedical Science and Engineering, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/bse.146
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.