Clinical Research and Empirical Research
Accepted: September 5, 2020
PDF: 59
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
In this article, the author intends to show how the integration between clinical research and empirical research can function according to the model of reciprocal disturbance between data and observations produced by two distinct knowledge systems. The author highlights how there is a strong influence of clinical research on hypotheses that are tested in empirical studies and the potential effect of empirical data on the clarification and focusing of fundamental issues for clinical practice and treatment success. Subsequently, the author discusses the enhancement of "good practices" compared to errors and important repudiation of factors that determine the outcome of therapies. Consequently, the author"s interest focuses on training courses with a perspective that favours an approach where the attention of the trainee clinician is balanced between observable "anchor points" (borrowed from research) and intuitive in-depth analyses and descriptive patterns derived from clinical experience that enrich psychoanalytic literature.
How to Cite
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
Similar Articles
- Daniele Morelli, Laura Corbelli, Creativity in psychotherapy as a ‘co-reflexive dialogue between acting subjects’: a clinical and theoretical proposal , Ricerca Psicoanalitica: Vol. 35 No. 2 (2024)
- Claudia Zaccaria, Francesca Balestra, Response to colleague's comment , Ricerca Psicoanalitica: Vol. 34 No. 3 (2023)
You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.