https://doi.org/10.4081/psyco.2018.20
Jurisprudential Review on Psychography
Published: 6 June 2018
Abstract Views: 703
PDF: 1214
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
With specific reference to the ability to understand and/or want, the ability to test and the psychic state of the handwriting, to be understood as extended to all other areas of expertise also in the civil field including the invalidity of marriage, adoption and custody (pedagogical skills), we list by way of example only some of the judgments directly sent to us in full by the Court of Treviso (Cons. Dr. Francesco Pedoja), the Court of Siena (Cons. Dr. Dario Perrucci), the Court of Pordenone (Avv. Guido Comis) and others, as an example of having transposed the evolution of graphological science into the legal discipline.
Edited by
PsicografologiaHow to Cite
Mastronardi, V. (2018). Jurisprudential Review on Psychography. Rivista Di Psicopatologia Forense, Medicina Legale, Criminologia, 23(1), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.4081/psyco.2018.20