https://doi.org/10.4081/ilpolitico.2021.570
OAKESHOTT AND HAYEK
Published: June 7, 2021
Abstract Views: 159
PDF (Italiano): 167
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
The very title of this Oakeshott sylloge, Rationalism in Politics, evokes Hayek's critique of 'constructivism'. The topic of convergences and differences between Hayek and Oakeshott is now a much plowed field. According to Kenneth Minogue, Hayek and Oakeshott were 'good friends'. Those who read the works of one and the other will not fail to notice that the starting point was very different: the denunciation of the "fatal presumption" of social engineers comes to Hayek from his participation in the debate on economic calculation in the plan economy, in the 1930s.
How to Cite
Mingardi, A. (2021). OAKESHOTT AND HAYEK. Il Politico, 254(1), 134–136. https://doi.org/10.4081/ilpolitico.2021.570