https://doi.org/10.4081/ilpolitico.2021.566
A NOTE ON OAKESHOTT, BETWEEN HEGEL AND SCHMITT
Published: June 7, 2021
Abstract Views: 138
PDF (Italiano): 142
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Perhaps it is no coincidence that some authors, prima facie politically far from Oakeshott, such as Chantal Mouffe, theorist of 'left-wing populism', have positively evaluated the arguments of this philosopher, albeit within the limits related to the apparent overcoming of liberal positions and without sufficiently considering the fact that the overcoming of liberalism, in Oakeshott, is a dialectical overcoming, just in the sense of Hegel's philosophy.
How to Cite
Carrino, A. (2021). A NOTE ON OAKESHOTT, BETWEEN HEGEL AND SCHMITT. Il Politico, 254(1), 126–127. https://doi.org/10.4081/ilpolitico.2021.566