https://doi.org/10.4081/hmr.v1i7.630

Second line treatment for relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Vol. 1 No. 7: Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Achievements and Controversies
Published: June 16, 2009
Abstract Views: 185
PDF: 1354
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Giuseppe Rossi
support@pagepress.org
In spite of the remarkable therapeutic achievements obtained with purine analogues and monoclonal antibodies, chronic lymphatic leukaemia (CLL) has still to be considered an incurable disease. Indeed, in the vast majority of patients, the natural history of the disease is characterized by multiple relapses and by multiple remissions, induced by the potential treatments available.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Supporting Agencies

How to Cite

Rossi, G. (2009). Second line treatment for relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Hematology Meeting Reports (formerly Haematologica Reports), 1(7). https://doi.org/10.4081/hmr.v1i7.630
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).