The top 100 most cited articles in acne vulgaris: a bibliometric analysis


Submitted: 4 November 2023
Accepted: 3 December 2023
Published: 15 February 2024
Abstract Views: 2557
PDF: 217
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: 80
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

A substantial body of literature has been published on acne vulgaris (AV) in the past five decades. Bibliometric analysis (BA) is a scientific, statistical evaluation review of published articles, providing a quantitative assessment of past research. The Web of Science (webOS) citation indexing database was used on 11 June 2023 to identify the top 100 cited articles on AV. Articles were listed in descending order by their annual citation (AC). Data sets were then subdivided into senior author, year and age of publication, journal and its impact factor, the number of total citations according to the webOS, corresponding and senior author’s affiliated institution, country of origin, manuscript type, study design, and research focus. The top 100 most cited articles were published between 1974 and 2020. The mean number of citations ranges between 82 and 688. The most cited paper was Guidelines of care for the management of Acne Vulgaris by Zaenglein, with an AC of 98.2. The largest number of manuscripts was published between 2001 and 2010 (n = 47). The British Journal of Dermatology had the highest number of published manuscripts (15). Of the original research papers, 28% were of a level of evidence 1, 56% focused on treatment, 19.5% on epidemiology, and 16.5% on pathogenesis. This analysis provides detailed bibliometric characteristics, highlighting the worldwide acne burden, with the hope that future researchers will explore the gaps in the AV literature.


Nast A, Dréno B, Bettoli V, et al. European evidence-based (S3) guidelines for the treatment of acne. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol JEADV. 2012;26,Suppl 1:1–29.

Bhate K, Williams HC. Epidemiology of acne vulgaris. Br J Dermatol. 2013 Mar;168:474–85.

Heng AHS, Chew FT. Systematic review of the epidemiology of acne vulgaris. Sci Rep. 2020;10:5754.

Layton AM, Thiboutot D, Tan J. Reviewing the global burden of acne: how could we improve care to reduce the burden? Br J Dermatol. 2021;184:219–25.

Aktan S, Ozmen E, Sanli B. Anxiety, depression, and nature of acne vulgaris in adolescents. Int J Dermatol. 2000;39:354–7.

Gupta MA, Gupta AK. Depression and suicidal ideation in dermatology patients with acne, alopecia areata, atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 1998;139:846–50.

Thompson AM, Seivright J, Hsiao JL, et al. Bibliometric analysis of the 50 most cited publications in atopic dermatitis. Pediatr Dermatol. 2022;39:578–83.

Kim D, Chae Y, Park HJ, et al. A Bibliometric Analysis of Atopic Dermatitis Research over the Past Three Decades and Future Perspectives. Healthc Basel Switz. 2021;9:1749.

Wu JJ, Choi YM, Marczynski W. The 100 most cited psoriasis articles in clinical dermatologic journals, 1970 to 2012. J Clin Aesthetic Dermatol. 2014;7:10–9.

Malik S, Matushansky JT, Thomas C, et al. The Top 100 Most-Cited Articles on Nail Psoriasis: A Bibliometric Analysis. Cutis. 2021;108:76.

Berlinberg A, Bilal J, Riaz IB, et al. The 100 top-cited publications in psoriatic arthritis: a bibliometric analysis. Int J Dermatol. 2019;58:1023–34.

Joyce CW, Sugrue CM, Joyce KM, et al. 100 citation classics in the melanoma literature: a bibliometric analysis. Dermatol Surg Off Publ Am Soc Dermatol Surg Al. 2014;40:1284–98.

Shih T, De DR, Thompson AM, et al. Global geographic bibliometric analysis of hidradenitis suppurativa publications. Int J Dermatol. 2021;17.

Seivright J, Thompson AM, Atluri S, et al. Hidradenitis suppurativa research from Africa: a bibliometric analysis. Int J Dermatol. 2021;60:e410–4.

Wang Y, Zhang H, Fang R, et al. The top 100 most cited articles in rosacea: a bibliometric analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol JEADV. 2020;34:2177–82.

Mahamud I, Mainwaring A. 50 years in urinary incontinence: a bibliometric analysis of the top 100 cited articles of the last 50 years. Int Urogynecology J. 2022;33:919–30.

Bullock N, Ellul T, Bennett A, et al. The 100 most influential manuscripts in andrology: a bibliometric analysis. Basic Clin Androl. 2018;28:15.

Antoniou SA, Lasithiotakis K, Koch OO, et al. Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Contributions in Minimally Invasive General Surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014;24.

Mainwaring A, Bullock N, Ellul T, et al. The top 100 most cited manuscripts in bladder cancer: A bibliometric analysis (review article). Int J Surg Lond Engl. 2020;75:130–8.

Ellul T, Bullock N, Abdelrahman T, et al. The 100 most cited manuscripts in emergency abdominal surgery: A bibliometric analysis. Int J Surg Lond Engl. 2017;37:29–35.

Amichai B, Shemer A, Grunwald MH. Low-dose isotretinoin in the treatment of acne vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54:644–6.

Sakamoto FH, Lopes JD, Anderson RR. Photodynamic therapy for acne vulgaris: a critical review from basics to clinical practice: part I. Acne vulgaris: when and why consider photodynamic therapy? J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;63:183–93; quiz 193–4.

Sakamoto FH, Torezan L, Anderson RR. Photodynamic therapy for acne vulgaris: a critical review from basics to clinical practice: part II. Understanding parameters for acne treatment with photodynamic therapy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;63:195 211; quiz 211–2.

Zaenglein AL, Pathy AL, Schlosser BJ, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of acne vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74:945-973.e33.

Jacobsen T. Beauty and the brain: culture, history and individual differences in aesthetic appreciation. J Anat. 2010;216:184–91.

Zaenglein AL, Pathy AL, Schlosser BJ, et al. Guidelines of care for the management of acne vulgaris. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74:945-973.e33.

Garfield E. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA. 2006;295:90–3.

Karimkhani C, Dellavalle RP, Coffeng LE, et al. Global Skin Disease Morbidity and Mortality: An Update From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. JAMA Dermatol. 2017;153:406–12.

Cordain L, Lindeberg S, Hurtado M, et al. Acne vulgaris: a disease of Western civilization. Arch Dermatol. 2002;138:1584–90.

Peck GM, Roberson FA, Feldman SR. Why Do Patients in the United States Seek Care from Dermatologists? Dermatol Ther. 2022;12:1065–72.

Bickers DR, Lim HW, Margolis D, et al. The burden of skin diseases: 2004 a joint project of the American Academy of Dermatology Association and the Society for Investigative Dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;55:490–500.

Tassavor M, Payette MJ. Estimated cost efficacy of U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments for acne. Dermatol Ther. 2019;32:e12765.

Radtke MA, Schäfer I, Augustin M. [Pharmacoeconomy in acne—evaluation of benefit and economics]. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges J Ger Soc Dermatol JDDG. 2010;8 Suppl 1:S105-114.

Smith RN, Mann NJ, Braue A, et al. The effect of a high-protein, low glycemic-load diet versus a conventional, high glycemic-load diet on biochemical parameters associated with acne vulgaris: a randomized, investigator-masked, controlled trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;57:247–56.

A low-glycemic-load diet improves symptoms in acne vulgaris patients: a randomized controlled trial - PubMed [Internet]. [cited 2022 Dec 20]. Available from:

h t t p s : / / p u b m e d - n c b i - n l m - n i h - gov.ezproxy.bgu.ac.il/17616769/

Wells HF, Buzby JC, editors. Dietary Assessment of Major Trends in U.S. Food Consumption, 1970-2005. 2008. 20 p. (Economic Information Bulletin).

Neri D, Martinez-Steele E, Monteiro CA, et al. Consumption of ultra-processed foods and its association with added sugar content in the diets of US children, NHANES 2009-2014. Pediatr Obes. 2019;14:e12563.

Imai T, Miyamoto K, Sezaki A, et al. Traditional Japanese Diet Score - Association with Obesity, Incidence of Ischemic Heart Disease, and Healthy Life Expectancy in a Global Comparative Study. J Nutr Health Aging. 2019;23:717–24.

Tasoula E, Gregoriou S, Chalikias J, et al. The impact of acne vulgaris on quality of life and psychic health in young adolescents in Greece. Results of a population survey. An Bras Dermatol. 2012;87:862–9.

Lasek RJ, Chren MM. Acne vulgaris and the quality of life of adult dermatology patients. Arch Dermatol. 1998;134:454–8.

Lucky AW, Biro FM, Huster GA, et al. Acne vulgaris in early adolescent boys. Correlations with pubertal maturation and age. Arch Dermatol. 1991;127:210–6.

Lynn DD, Umari T, Dunnick CA, et al. The epidemiology of acne vulgaris in late adolescence. Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2016;7:13–25.

Kilkenny M, Merlin K, Plunkett A, et al. The prevalence of common skin conditions in Australian school students: 3. acne vulgaris. Br J Dermatol. 1998;139:840–5.

Cunliffe WJ, Gould DJ. Prevalence of facial acne vulgaris in late adolescence and in adults. Br Med J. 1979;1:1109–10.

Lucky AW, Biro FM, Simbartl LA, et al. Predictors of severity of acne vulgaris in young adolescent girls: results of a fiveyear longitudinal study. J Pediatr. 1997;130:30–9.

Leyden JJ, McGinley KJ, Mills OH, et al. Propionibacterium levels in patients with and without acne vulgaris. J Invest Dermatol. 1975;65:382–4.

Jahns AC, Lundskog B, Ganceviciene R, et al. An increased incidence of Propionibacterium acnes biofilms in acne vulgaris: a case-control study. Br J Dermatol. 2012;167:50–8.

Smith RN, Braue A, Varigos GA, et al. The effect of a low glycemic load diet on acne vulgaris and the fatty acid composition of skin surface triglycerides. J Dermatol Sci. 2008;50:41–52.

Kwon HH, Yoon JY, Hong JS, et al. Clinical and histological effect of a low glycaemic load diet in treatment of acne vulgaris in Korean patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Acta Derm Venereol. 2012;92:241–6.

Itzhaki Gabay, S., Zlakishvili, B., Valdman-Grinshpoun , Y., & Horev, A. (2024). The top 100 most cited articles in acne vulgaris: a bibliometric analysis. Dermatology Reports, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.4081/dr.2024.9886

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations